Skip to main content
Fig. 1 | Cancer Imaging

Fig. 1

From: Comparison of quantitative whole body PET parameters on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT using ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM) vs. bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithms in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Fig. 1

Images quantification (left column) in a patient with local recurrence in prostate bed (blue couture), regional and distant nodal (green contours) and widespread osseous metastatic disease (red contours) with same target lesion (lower thoracic spine) on both OSEM and Q.Clear images. The OSEM (middle column) and BPL (right column) reconstructed images in a different patient, show different target lesions, an osseous lesion (SUVmax: 21.1) on OSEM and a retroperitoneal lymph node (SUVmax: 30.7) on Q.Clear images. The SUVmean and MTV were 6.5 and 55 mL on OSEM compared to 7.1 and 48mL on Q.Clear reconstructed images, respectively

Back to article page

Cancer Imaging

ISSN: 1470-7330

Contact us