Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison between quantitative parameters achieved from OSEM and Q.Clear reconstructed images

From: Comparison of quantitative whole body PET parameters on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT using ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM) vs. bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithms in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

 

OSEM Recon

Q.Clear Recon

Target lesion

Prostate gland/Prostate bed

3 (6)

3 (6)

Lymph nodes

6 (12)

7 (14)

Bone

40 (80)

39 (78)

Viscera

1 (2)

1 (2)

Disease volume

Low (MTV < 40 mL)

11 (22)

11 (22)

High (MTV > 40 mL)

39 (78)

39 (78)

Total population

SUVmax (range)

38.7 (4.1–133.3)

47.1 (4.4–180.4)

Mean difference (95% CI)

 

8.4 (5.2–11.5)

SUVmean (range)

7.1 (3.3–13.0)

7.8 (3.3–14.8)

Mean difference (95% CI)

 

0.7 (0.5–0.9)

MTV (range)

654.5 (2.8–4552.8)

632.9 (2.9–4833.9)

Mean difference (95% CI)

 

-21.5 (-48.2–26.7)

Low volume disease (MTV < 40 ml)

SUVmax (range)

19.8 (4.1–44.5)

23.8 (4.4–63.4)

Mean difference (95% CI)

 

4.0 (0.4–7.7)

SUVmean (range)

6.0 (3.3–10.3)

6.6 (3.3–11.8)

Mean difference (95% CI)

 

0.6 (0.2–1.1)

MTV (range)

15.0 (2.8–24.4)

14.6 (2.9–27.7)

Mean difference (95% CI)

 

-0.4 (-2.0–1.3)

High volume disease (MTV > 40 ml)

SUVmax (range)

44.1 (9.43–133.3)

53.7 (8.0–180.4)

Mean difference (95% CI)

 

9.6 (5.7–13.5)

SUVmean (range)

7.4 (4.2–13)

8.1 (4.22–14.8)

Mean difference (95% CI)

 

0.7 (0.5–0.9)

MTV (range)

834.8 (49–4552.8)

807.3 (48.2–4833.9)

Mean difference (95% CI)

 

-27.5 (-61.8–6.8)

SUVmean threshold subgroup analysis

  

SUVmean < 10

39 (78)

37 (74)

SUVmean ≥ 10

11 (22)

13 (26)

SUVmean < 7

25 (50)

24 (48)

SUVmean ≥ 7

25 (50)

26 (52)

  1. Qualitative data are number followed by percentage (n = 50); continuous data are mean followed by range